
The chart above is based on data from Howard County, Texas. Its significance is that there was a clear break from a rising trend in oil production with a bounded gas/oil ratio to a new trend of straight-line decline in oil production rate combined with a more rapidly rising gas/oil ratio. The physical explanation for why that happened is that as reservoir pressure in the oil producing horizons continued falling with production, it eventually fell below the bubble point at which gas comes out of solution in the oil. This happened in September 2023. Once gas bubbles form, they are far less viscous than oil and travel through the fracking-induced cracks faster than oil. This trend is self-reinforcing and the gas to oil production ratio rises faster.
In the year to September 2024, Howard County’s oil production rate fell 30%. If that decline rate continues, Howard County’s oil production will be next to nothing in a few years. So, going through the bubble point of a reservoir has significant economic impact. At the county level, Loving County is also showing a clear break in trend that is bubble point driven:

The production decline in Loving County is 24,000 barrels per day since September 2024. This is an annualised decline rate of 35%. Loving County is also a significant gas producer from its gas wells, almost a billion cubic feet per day. The following graph shows the condensate yield of Loving County’s gas production from 2010:

Five years ago, Loving County’s condensate yield was almost 250 barrels per million cubic feet, indicating that the gas in the reservoir was likely at the limit of what it could hold in solution. The straight-line decline trend since then indicates that liquid hydrocarbons having been dropping out of solution in the reservoir as reservoir pressure drops with continued production.
With the methodology established at the county level, it now can be applied at the District level. The gas/oil ratio plot of District 8 of the Texas Railroad Commission follows:

There was a clear break in trend in June 2024. The monthly decline rate since then has averaged 32,000 barrels per day, an annualised rate of decline of 13%. At that rate, from December’s production rate of 2.7 million barrels per day, production would fall by 350,000 barrels per day by December 2025.
District 8 contains Loving and Howard counties. It is also a significant gas and condensate producer:

The chart shows that, while gas production has been relatively flat for the last five years, condensate production starting diving a few months ago as shown in this graph of condensate yield for District 8:

The sudden decline in yield starting in July 2024 suggests that in an originally undersaturated gas reservoir in District 8, the reservoir pressure fell below the point at which retrograde condensation of liquid hydrocarbons starts. While gas production might hold up as operators open chokes to reduce backpressure on their reservoirs, liquids production might fall rapidly.

Mike
Yes I do post a District 8 GOR chart. However I do precede it with the following: "Plotting an oil production vs GOR graph for a district may be a bit of a stretch"
As I have noted before I am just a number cruncher that turns numbers into pretty charts. I thank you for telling me a few years back that plotting county GORs was a reasonable thing to do. I just happend to plot a District 8 GOR and decided to post it and let the readers decide if was meaningful. The District 8 GOR reflects the high GOR in a large number of counties.
For District 8, attached is a projected production chart which I believe is too optimistic because of the large number of small revisions to the previous months in the January report. Hopefully those revisons will be smaller in the February report.
Attached is a GOR chart for Glasscock which I recently looked into. Pretty wild. Hopefully someone with local experience can shed some light on that wild ride.
At this time I think it all points to the Texas Permian being on a plateau and possibly getting ready to head down.
Ovi
Mike, I generated a lot of graphs for other counties. If you email me at davidarchibaldperth@gmail.com I will send you the lot.
Novi seems to suggest you are very close, David. They get their stuff from the TRRC as well. For the District, oil seems to be rolling over and I am always suprised how much of an increased role associated gas plays in the production stream in both sub-basins, particularly the Midland. Fewer wells being drilled in both sub basins would statistically change GOR but well completions have been steady state for the past 3 years. There have been some minor bench changes in the Midland Basin that could change initial GOR, but I don't believe enough to matter. I have seen, have in posession, the well breakdown per bench and its all about the Wolfcamp A, man; when that baby is dried up, whoa Nellie!
Those big dying tails at the end of the data are algo hiccups of some kind, not real data. I've seen those forever with SPC stuff.
So, everything is behaving as expected. Its getting gassier than hell; ask FANG (and Exxon, who I thought had a no flaring policy...or was the Chevron?):
I went searching for the County that caused the District 8 condensate yield drop in mid-2024. It would be Reeves County:
Note a plateau of production from 2020:
Data source is the Texas Railroad Commission, not using Jan 2025 data : General Production Query Criteria
That's quite the chart. Fair bit of implications involved. I am going to sound like a pain in the ass here. I would like to know where you gleaned the data from. It's not a trust issue, but independent verification is necessary in today's keyboard analyst culture.. thanks for posting this. That break through chart is bit jaw dropping.